Back to Atlas

EyeArt AI Eye Screening System

Eyenuk

Autonomously analyzes retinal images to screen people with diabetes for diabetic retinopathy.

Designed for

Healthcare provider

Care setting

Primary care and eye screening

Specialty

Ophthalmology, Primary care

Public evidence assessedReviewed August 31, 2026

Bottom line

EyeArt has strong prospective pivotal evidence for autonomous diabetic retinopathy detection under defined conditions. The largest remaining questions concern real-world imageability, referral completion, equitable performance, and whether greater screening access translates into better vision outcomes.

Based on public sources. RIR did not independently test this product. This is not an endorsement or recommendation.

What the evidence supports

Reviewed sources establish an authorized autonomous screening workflow for defined diabetic retinopathy findings.

What remains uncertain

Performance in local populations, imageability rates, referral completion, and outcomes after screening require site-specific evaluation.

How it was studied

EyeArt version 2.1.0 was evaluated in a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study of 942 consenting adults at 15 primary and eye-care sites. Its outputs were compared with reading-center grading of a rigorous ETDRS-based reference standard.

Intended use
Provide an automated diabetic retinopathy screening result from compatible retinal images within the authorized population.
Represented version
FDA-cleared EyeArt system; camera and software configuration require confirmation
Regulatory context
EyeArt has FDA clearance for a defined autonomous diabetic retinopathy screening use. Exact labeling and compatible cameras require confirmation.

2 public sources represented in this evidence profile.

For clinical and investment reviewEvidence context and questions for deeper review

Evidence source base

Peer-reviewed pivotal evidence with company funding and involvement, plus regulatory records. Local workflow evidence remains separate.

Important limitation

Pivotal accuracy and imageability do not establish local referral completion, equity, camera and operator transportability, long-term vision outcomes, or current-version durability.

Questions to ask

  1. 01What proportion of local patients receive an insufficient-image result?
  2. 02How does performance vary by disease and demographic subgroup?
  3. 03Are positive referrals completed on time?