Back to Atlas

Paige Prostate

Paige

Assists pathologists in detecting areas suspicious for cancer in digitized prostate needle biopsy slides.

Designed for

Pathologist

Care setting

Pathology laboratory

Specialty

Pathology, Urologic oncology

Public evidence assessedReviewed August 31, 2026

Bottom line

Paige Prostate has a strong regulated reader-assistance evidence base showing that pathologist performance can be studied with and without AI. The evidence supports an assistive role under the defined workflow more clearly than broad claims across every scanner, laboratory, variant, or later version.

Based on public sources. RIR did not independently test this product. This is not an endorsement or recommendation.

What the evidence supports

Reviewed regulatory and study sources support adjunctive cancer detection in the defined digital prostate biopsy workflow.

What remains uncertain

Current-version performance across scanners, laboratories, rare morphologies, and changing case mix requires local confirmation.

How it was studied

The FDA De Novo review includes standalone testing and a pathologist reader study comparing performance with and without Paige Prostate. The intended workflow keeps the pathologist responsible for the primary review before activating the AI result.

Intended use
Support review of digitized prostate needle biopsy slides by identifying foci suspicious for cancer.
Represented version
FDA-authorized Paige Prostate device; deployed configuration requires confirmation
Regulatory context
Paige Prostate received FDA De Novo authorization under DEN200080 for a defined in vitro diagnostic use.
For clinical and investment reviewEvidence context and questions for deeper review

Evidence source base

FDA-reviewed developer-sponsored evidence and published supporting work. Local laboratory and scanner validation remain essential.

Important limitation

A controlled reader study does not establish performance across every scanner, stain, laboratory process, rare variant, current version, or long-term diagnostic workflow.

Questions to ask

  1. 01Which scanners and slide preparations are supported?
  2. 02How are discordant AI and pathologist findings resolved?
  3. 03How is performance monitored after workflow changes?